![]() ![]() However, studies have shown that while comparative advertisements had increased since 1960, the relative amount of comparative advertising is still small. The FTC argued that this form of advertising could also stimulate comparison shopping, encourage product improvement and innovation, and foster a positive competitive environment. ![]() In 1972, the FTC began to encourage advertisers to make comparison with named competitors, with the broad, public welfare objective of creating more informative advertising. For instance, comparative advertising could invite misidentification of products, potential legal issues, and might even win public sympathy for their competitors as victims. Prior to the 1970s, comparative advertising was deemed unfeasible due to related risks. The earliest court case concerning comparative advertising dates back to 1910 in the United States – Saxlehner v Wagner. Different countries apply differing views regarding the laws on comparative advertising. Ĭomparative advertisements could be either indirectly or directly comparative, positive or negative, and seeks "to associate or differentiate the two competing brands". Similarly, the Law Council of Australia recently suggested that comparative advertising refers to "advertising which include reference to a competitor’s trademark in a way which does not impute proprietorship in the mark to the advertiser". This definition was used in the case Gillette Australia Pty Ltd v Energizer Australia Pty Ltd. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) defined comparative advertising as "advertisement that compares alternative brands on objectively measurable attributes or price, and identifies the alternative brand by name, illustration or other distinctive information". ![]() (" Wikipedia tastes better and is less filling than the Encyclopedia Galactica.") This should not be confused with parody advertisements, where a fictional product is being advertised for the purpose of poking fun at the particular advertisement, nor should it be confused with the use of a coined brand name for the purpose of comparing the product without actually naming an actual competitor. An advertising war is said to be occurring when competing products or services exchange comparative or combative advertisements mentioning each other. Also referred to as "knocking copy", it is loosely defined as advertising where "the advertised brand is explicitly compared with one or more competing brands and the comparison is obvious to the audience". Comparative advertising, or combative advertising, is an advertisement in which a particular product, or service, specifically mentions a competitor by name for the express purpose of showing why the competitor is inferior to the product naming it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |